Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2010-04-08 15:12:44
Size: 1159
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2010-04-08 15:13:32
Size: 1162
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 18: Line 18:
== Second case: endogenous nonstationary process
{{{$!latex
== Second case: endogenous nonstationary process ==
{{{#!latex

Automatic removing of trends

Stationarizing a non-linear model by hand is a tedious process that is better done by the computer.

Computing the equilibrium growth rates of a balanced growth model is complicated and will not be attempted here. We limit ourselves to replace non-stationary variables by their stationary counterpart as specified by the user.

First case: exogenous nonstationary process

\begin{eqnarray*}
y_t &=& A_t k_{t-1}^\alpha\\
A_t &=& (1+g_t)A_{t-1}\\
g_t &=& \rho\, g_{t-1}+e_t
\end{eqnarray*}

Assuming that $y_t$ and $k_t$ have common trend $A_t$, the stationarizing procedure calls for dividing first and second equation by $A_t$. The second equation becomes meaningless and corresponds to the fact that $A_t$ doesn't belong to the stationary model.

Second case: endogenous nonstationary process

\begin{eqnarray*}
P_t\,C_t &= W_t\, L_t\\
P_t &= (1+\pi_t) P_{t-1}\\
r_t &= \rho_1 (\pi_t - \bar \pi)
\end{eqnarray*}

In this case as well, the second equation becomes meaningless after stationarizing the model.

DynareWiki: RemovingTrends (last edited 2021-04-06 10:18:41 by JohannesPfeifer)