RBC MODEL - Chapter 3 User Guide - Different solutions

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

RBC MODEL - Chapter 3 User Guide - Different solutions

Postby fabio_portugal » Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:53 pm

Hello,
I’m trying to replicate the RBC model with monopolistic competition that is anaalyzed in the User Guide – Public Beta Version (chapter 3.2) (I’m using Dynare version 3.065).

I have noted that if we change the method that is used for compute the steady state (command: steady(solve_algo = …)), the simulation leads to a two different result.

In particular, when we use steady(solve_algo=0), steady(solve_algo=1) or steady(solve_algo=2), the steady state results:

c 0.707986
i 0.184098
k 8.00426
l 0.302733
r 0.033101
w 1.7769
y 0.892084
y_l 2.94677
z 1.27447e-056

whereas if we use steady(solve_algo=3), the steady state results:

c 0.76
i 0
k 9
l 0.3
r 0.03
w 2.07
y 0
y_l 0
z 0

Moreover, as you can see from the figures, also the Impulse Response Functions (IRFs) are differents.

My questions are: Am I miss something? Where is the error in my simulation? Which is the right solution?

Thank you very much.
Fabio
Attachments
DynareForum.doc
(133 KiB) Downloaded 171 times
Fabio Verona
Research Economist
Monetary Policy and Research Department
BANK OF FINLAND
fabio_portugal
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:06 am
Location: Helsinki

Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests