Thanks dear jpfeifer,
Given is not very clear to me how to choose shocks for controlling controlled variables, I am thinking use the methodology of Banbura, Gianonne and Lenza: "CONDITIONAL FORECASTS AND SCENARIO ANALYSIS WITH VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS FOR LARGE CROSS-SECTIONS".
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1733.pdf?34d83c4b9cc14af18001108a69abb1c3They don't need to specify these shocks, and it can also be applied to a state space representation like a DSGE model, in short they start from the idea (details is found in pag. 16)
In fact, the variables for which we do not assume the knowledge of a future path can be considered as time series with missing data. The Kalman filter allows to easily deal with such time series
and their algorithm follows these steps:
1. They derive a state space representation from the original s-s by removing the rows, also columns that correspond to the missing observations.
2. Draw states using smoother simulation for the modified (for the missing data) state space representation.
3. Using measure equation compute future values of unconditioned variables.
In this respect I found this reply in Help:
Re: Missing observations
Postby jpfeifer ยป Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:25 am
Dynare will use the longer sample and treat the missing values as unobserved states during the Kalman filter routine, i.e. their best forecast is inferred from the model and the remaining data.
And my question are:
1. If I could consider unconditioned variables as missing observations ? so when they are estimated in Dynare, may I consider them as forecasts?
2. Related to first. Is there only point estimated for missing observations? or Can we find output from several paths in order to compute percentiles?
Thanks,
Aldo