Page 2 of 2
Re: B-K conditions are not satisfied
Posted:
Mon May 22, 2017 7:39 am
by cgg_user
Thank you for your help!!!!
The nonlinear fiscal rule is the following:
gt=gt-1-phib(bgyt-1-bgybar)-phibb(bgyt-bgyt-1)
where g =government spending
bgy =public debt-to-gdp ratio
bgybar=ss public debt-to-gdp ratio
I tried to simplify the rule and I also change the coefficient values but nothing works. The problem appears when I have public debt in period t and t-1 with government spending at t-1. Government spending shows up in the market clearing condition, and in the government budget constraint only.
Re: B-K conditions are not satisfied
Posted:
Mon May 22, 2017 4:15 pm
by jpfeifer
This suggests the presence of a conceptual problem. Try to work with the easiest version of your model and the most simple rule. I am also puzzled by the unit root between
- Code: Select all
gt=gt-1+...
That part does not seem standard.
Re: B-K conditions are not satisfied
Posted:
Mon May 22, 2017 5:30 pm
by cgg_user
Thanks for your response!!!
Thank you for your response!!!
I think that there is something weird in the calibration. The time period in the model corresponds to one quarter in the data. Following some papers I consider b/Y=0.8*4. Then it seems that government spending react too much to public debt... if I consider 0.8 only everything works but then there is no difference if I look at the IRF with the case in which there is no public sector.
I attach the non-linear version of the model.
Thanks!
Re: B-K conditions are not satisfied
Posted:
Mon May 22, 2017 5:38 pm
by jpfeifer
Getting a version with feedback rules that satisfies the BK conditions can be tricky (as you are experiencing). That was the reason I suggested to start with a simpler version where it is easier to find the uniqueness and determinacy parameter region. And yes, too much feedback can indeed happen.
Re: B-K conditions are not satisfied
Posted:
Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:28 pm
by mtnttk
I resolved the model again and I get the following error message. I am very thankful for your help.
There are 3 eigenvalue(s) larger than 1 in modulus
for 4 forward-looking variable(s)
The rank condition ISN'T verified!
Error using print_info (line 45)
Blanchard Kahn conditions are not satisfied: indeterminacy
Error in stoch_simul (line 98)
print_info(info, options_.noprint, options_);
Error in stackelbergml (line 329)
info = stoch_simul(var_list_);
Error in dynare (line 180)
evalin('base',fname)
Re: B-K conditions are not satisfied
Posted:
Thu Jun 01, 2017 4:18 pm
by jpfeifer
Again, I can only tell you to check the model timing, specificiation and parameterization.