Page 1 of 1

shock_decomposition differs from simult_

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 2:56 pm
by zhanshuo
Hi, dear professor, I find that shocks decomposition result is different from what I get from using simult_ with the certain smoothed shock series.
Is it normal?
how to explain the difference?
Thanks!

Re: shock_decomposition differs from simult_

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2017 6:35 pm
by jpfeifer
No, that is not normal. Using the smoothed states at the beginning with the smoothed shocks should give the series exactly. Are you sure the variable and shock ordering is correct?

Re: shock_decomposition differs from simult_

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 2:57 am
by zhanshuo
The order is right, and the result is sometimes slightly different, or alike in shape but different in degree.
So what do you think possibly is the reason?
I wonder maybe the calibrated model may not rightly use the estimated parameters result.
I just manually draw the estimated results out into a calibrated model.
Is there a easier and more reliable way to directly use the estimated parameters to do IRF experiments repeatedly?

Re: shock_decomposition differs from simult_

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 1:37 pm
by zhanshuo
I look into the m files in dynare and I find out that shock decomposition call for the file of "evaluate_smoother", which I doubt may different from the simult command.
So is it possible that cause the difference?

Re: shock_decomposition differs from simult_

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 1:52 pm
by jpfeifer
The call to
Code: Select all
evaluate_smoother
will generate the smoothed shocks and observables given the parameter set provided. If the parameter set is the same as from estimation, the results should be the same as with simult_ given the smoother estimates.