Pruning in Dynare 4.1

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Pruning in Dynare 4.1

Postby lombard » Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:34 pm

Hi,

It seems to me that also in Dynare 4.1 there is no pruning of the solution when computing IRFs.

If this is the case, it is a bit unfortunate. I understood from discussions on this forum that future developments of Dynare would
take account of this issue. (and the contribution by Stephan Fahr for second order solutions was a step in the right direction)

Is there any particular reason why Dynare developers have decided to neglect the problem of spurious explosive solutions when pruning is not implemented?

Best

Gianni
Please see the messages on this forum discussing pruning as well as Kim, Kim, Schaumburg and Sims (JEDC,2008) and Lombardo and Sutherland (JEDC, 2007) and the references to Judd therein.
lombard
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Basel

Re: Pruning in Dynare 4.1

Postby SébastienVillemot » Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:16 am

Hi

Pruning is indeed planned for the future, but probably for Dynare 4.2.

Best
Sébastien Villemot
Economist at OFCE – Sciences Po
SébastienVillemot
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: Pruning in Dynare 4.1

Postby locuas » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:03 pm

Hi,

Pruning is just part of the story. To compute IRFs in non-linear setups you need to use a generalized impulse response like in the papers by Pesaran and Potter. Be careful when reporting impulse responses!
locuas
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:23 pm


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests