Measurement equations, inflation and interest rates

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Measurement equations, inflation and interest rates

Postby Robert » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:20 pm

Dear all,
dear Johannes,

I just wanted to ask you two quick questions regarding the measurement equations of inflation and interest rates.

1) In Johannes' "Guide to Specifying Observation Equations for the Estimation of DSGE Models", you show how to demean the gross interest and inflation rates. Why is it for inflation (equation 39):
Code: Select all
... - log[mean(Pi_data)]
and for interest rates (equation 42):
Code: Select all
... - mean[log( 1 + R_data/(4-100) )]
Why is it not in both cases the log[mean(xxx_data)], since they are both gross rates?

2) My model is entered nonlinearly into dynare, and inflation and the interest rate are gross rates. Let's say I want to keep the mean in one of the observables, would I then just write the observation equation as:
Code: Select all
inflation_data = log(inflation)
This would mean I just feed in log inflation without demeaning it. This question is based on a post I read, where Johannes said that from his experience it is sometimes beneficial to feed in one undemeaned series. Or is not necessary to take the log in the mod file?

Many thanks for your help!

Rob
Robert
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Measurement equations, inflation and interest rates

Postby jpfeifer » Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:02 pm

Hi Rob,
1) This was an inconsistency on my behalf. Sorry for that. Usually, you want to make sure that the log deviations are mean 0. Due to Jensen's Inequality, you should work with mean(log()) in both cases, not the log(mean()). Only the former will result in mean 0 variables due to the uncertainty correction. I have updated the document accordingly.
2) Yes, that way you would keep the mean in the inflation rate (presuming it is measured as a quarterly/annual gross rate commensurate with the frequency of your model)
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Measurement equations, inflation and interest rates

Postby Robert » Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:31 pm

Hi Johannes,

Many thanks for your help and getting back to me! I will now start with the estimation of my model.

Best

Rob
Robert
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 3:10 pm


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests