Dear all,
In my model, I have a monopolistic labor market and sticky wage. Should I have to use wage or employment data in the estimation for a better identification of the labor market? If these data are not available, would this make the results not so good?
Thanks
Conglin
Dynare forums
Forums for asking questions, posting comments and uploading examples related to Dynare
Data Issue
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Data Issue
by jpfeifer » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:22 am
Hi,
it is always better to include observable variables in the model as the likelihood then cannot imply implausible moments for these data. The best example is the relative price of investment, whose importance for business cycle contributions to hugely overestimated, if it is not included as an observable into DSGE models, see Justiniano et al. 2010 http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~gep575/ISRP10_gt.pdf.
However, if the data is not available, the best you can do is estimate your model with data available.
it is always better to include observable variables in the model as the likelihood then cannot imply implausible moments for these data. The best example is the relative price of investment, whose importance for business cycle contributions to hugely overestimated, if it is not included as an observable into DSGE models, see Justiniano et al. 2010 http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~gep575/ISRP10_gt.pdf.
However, if the data is not available, the best you can do is estimate your model with data available.
- jpfeifer
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests