Hi everyone,
I have a question about the "bayesian irf" command (after MCMC) and "stoch_simul" command after MCMC. I compare the impulse responses produced by both command (the mean of the bayesian irf v.s. stoch_simul irf) but they are not same. Could someone please tell me what is the source of this difference?
Thank you very much in advance.
Dynare forums
Forums for asking questions, posting comments and uploading examples related to Dynare
Bayesian IRF
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Bayesian IRF
by MichelJuillard » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:53 pm
The mean of the the Bayesian IRFs is the mean of the distribution of the IRFs generated when parameters are drawn from the posterior distribution.
When you run stoch_simul after MCMC, the parameters of the model are set to their mean value in the posterior distribution.
But an IRF is a nonlinear function of the parameters, therefore the mean of the IRF is not identical to the IRF for the mean value of the parameters
Best
Michel
When you run stoch_simul after MCMC, the parameters of the model are set to their mean value in the posterior distribution.
But an IRF is a nonlinear function of the parameters, therefore the mean of the IRF is not identical to the IRF for the mean value of the parameters
Best
Michel
- MichelJuillard
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:51 am
Re: Bayesian IRF
by rain » Wed Aug 11, 2010 6:48 pm
Thank you very much for the quick reply. It is clear to me now.
Best...
Best...
- rain
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:13 am
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests