log-linearization vs variables in logs

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

log-linearization vs variables in logs

Postby gokceK » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:40 pm

Hello,
Currently I am woking on a DSGE model using Dynare and want to compare its moments with real data. Real data usually expressed in logs and HPfiltered. To obtain log deviations (percentage deviations) for variables in my model, one way is to make exp() trasformation for each variable.

I was wondering whether adding extra variables, like logY logC and adding new equations logY=log(Y), would also provide me log deviations for those extra variables? So are these two ways equivalent?

Plus should I expect different IRF behaviors between a nonlinear model and exp() transformed model?

I appreciate your help

Gokce
gokceK
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: log-linearization vs variables in logs

Postby kyri82 » Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:30 pm

How are the variables expressed in your model?
kyri82
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: Toulouse - France

Re: log-linearization vs variables in logs

Postby gokceK » Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:07 am

variables are expressed as in nonlinear equations. For example euler equation is beta*(1+r)*(1/c(+1))=(1/c)*(1+eta*b). I also find the SS for nonlinear model. But then to compare with the real log hp filtered data, I define additional variables and express lnc=log(c), so I look at the moments of these additional variables.

I was wondering whether this is a appropriate process?
gokceK
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:29 pm


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests