Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe 2004b replicate in dynare

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Re: Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe 2004b replicate in dynare

Postby jpfeifer » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:23 am

They do not match because of the difference in timing conventions. You have that
Code: Select all
A=rho*A(-1)+epsilon

SGU treat A as an exogenous state and present the response to A. Dynare splits A into two states:
Code: Select all
A(-1)

and
Code: Select all
epsilon

Because of this, you are looking at different objects.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe 2004b replicate in dynare

Postby hmz » Wed Jul 06, 2016 2:39 pm

Thanks for the responses.

Doesn't this mean that actually the x_t SGU define has to be x_t = [k_t; log(A_{t+1})] rather than x_t = [k_t; log(A_t)] as it is on p. 758?
hmz
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 6:52 pm

Re: Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe 2004b replicate in dynare

Postby jpfeifer » Thu Jul 07, 2016 8:35 am

No. At time t, A_t is predetermined (because exogenous). A_t+1 is not yet know and therefore associated with an expectational error.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Previous

Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests