Log-linearization and bons which are zero in steady state
Posted: Mon May 05, 2014 12:15 pm
Hi,
I have what is a relatively simple problem about log-linearization.
I have a NK model, which features bonds which are zero in steady state and has a Phillips curve. I want to use Dynare, so I am trying to work out what are my options.
I figure log-linearizing the entire model is out (bonds - can't take the log of zero). I gather I can't use a combination of log-linearization and linearization. So how then to deal with the Phillips Curve? Can I simply interpret the Phillips Curve as:
pi_t = Beta*E_t*((pi_t+1 - pi_bar) / pi_bar) + kappa*((mc_t-mc_bar) / mc_bar)?
It doesn't feel right. But otherwise, how can I reconcile the use of an equation in percentage deviations from steady state and other equations in levels which feature variables with steady states of zero?
How is this commonly accommodated?
Thanks in advance.
I have what is a relatively simple problem about log-linearization.
I have a NK model, which features bonds which are zero in steady state and has a Phillips curve. I want to use Dynare, so I am trying to work out what are my options.
I figure log-linearizing the entire model is out (bonds - can't take the log of zero). I gather I can't use a combination of log-linearization and linearization. So how then to deal with the Phillips Curve? Can I simply interpret the Phillips Curve as:
pi_t = Beta*E_t*((pi_t+1 - pi_bar) / pi_bar) + kappa*((mc_t-mc_bar) / mc_bar)?
It doesn't feel right. But otherwise, how can I reconcile the use of an equation in percentage deviations from steady state and other equations in levels which feature variables with steady states of zero?
How is this commonly accommodated?
Thanks in advance.