unexpected unit root
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 5:23 pm
Dear all,
I am trying to write a model of collateral constraint with inelastic labor supply and fixed wages.
The basis for this is the model by Jermann and Quadrini, 2012, "macroeconomic effects of financial shocks" (in which there is an enforcement constraint, and following them I assume this is always binding). I want to see what happen if (real) wages are fully rigid, and labor supply is inelastic (households supply all work needed by firms, e.g as in Shimer 2010), so that the response of unemployment is determined by the demand side.
Dynare can find the steady state, but then there is a unit root, which leads the IRF to never return to steady state. In addition, when I try to include the technology shock, BK condition is no more satisfied.
Has someone an idea of the origin of the unit root in my model?
Maybe the problem is basically my model itself... but I would appreciate if someone can help in finding what is wrong with it.
Thank you in advance,
Rudy
I am trying to write a model of collateral constraint with inelastic labor supply and fixed wages.
The basis for this is the model by Jermann and Quadrini, 2012, "macroeconomic effects of financial shocks" (in which there is an enforcement constraint, and following them I assume this is always binding). I want to see what happen if (real) wages are fully rigid, and labor supply is inelastic (households supply all work needed by firms, e.g as in Shimer 2010), so that the response of unemployment is determined by the demand side.
Dynare can find the steady state, but then there is a unit root, which leads the IRF to never return to steady state. In addition, when I try to include the technology shock, BK condition is no more satisfied.
Has someone an idea of the origin of the unit root in my model?
Maybe the problem is basically my model itself... but I would appreciate if someone can help in finding what is wrong with it.
Thank you in advance,
Rudy