Bayesian Estimation in Dynare versus B-VAR
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 4:05 pm
Dear Users,
I know that a DSGE model is in the end a VAR model. Thus it should be possible to estimate the parameters as one would estimate them in a VAR model. When doing a bayesian VAR estimation, one can estimate the parameters by first running a OLS regression on the model equations separately. Then using the results as priors for the bayesian estimation. Then runing the MCMC to get the posteriors.
My question is now the following. Why does Dynare first maximzes the liklihood function before runing the MCMC, and does not simply follow the approach in estimating B-VAR models?
Best,
Daniel
I know that a DSGE model is in the end a VAR model. Thus it should be possible to estimate the parameters as one would estimate them in a VAR model. When doing a bayesian VAR estimation, one can estimate the parameters by first running a OLS regression on the model equations separately. Then using the results as priors for the bayesian estimation. Then runing the MCMC to get the posteriors.
My question is now the following. Why does Dynare first maximzes the liklihood function before runing the MCMC, and does not simply follow the approach in estimating B-VAR models?
Best,
Daniel