RANK CONDITION NOT VERIFIED

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

RANK CONDITION NOT VERIFIED

Postby St_aueb » Sat May 23, 2015 10:00 pm

I have a simple 3-period OLG model. I am doing some tax/spending reforms by altering each time the residually determined fiscal policy instrument in the government budget constraint. I can find the steady-state, but it the rank condition message appears in some cases, depending on the adjusting instrument. I attach two mod files

In OLG_log.mod :

There are 12 eigenvalue(s) larger than 1 in modulus
for 12 forward-looking variable(s)

The rank condition ISN'T verified!

But everything its OK in OLG_log_sGs_adjusts.mod. I think it's a timing problem but I cannot find it. Please, any ideas. I m going crazy here!!!!!

Thank you!
Attachments
OLG_log_sGs_adjusts.mod
(6.94 KiB) Downloaded 58 times
OLG_log.mod
(6.98 KiB) Downloaded 61 times
St_aueb
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:07 am

Re: RANK CONDITION NOT VERIFIED

Postby jpfeifer » Sun May 24, 2015 11:19 am

I don't think this is a timing issue. It's not the Blanchard-Kahn conditions that are violated, but the rank condition. There may be a good economic reason why for some instruments, there is no unique determinate solution. Have you tried thinking about the economic intuition behind the different results for different instruments? Is there a pattern for which instruments it works?
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: RANK CONDITION NOT VERIFIED

Postby St_aueb » Sun May 24, 2015 9:03 pm

Thank you very much Johannes for your quick reply

I have many instruments (4 spending instruments, 4 tax instruments) so it is difficult to find a pattern for which instruments it works. It works fine for 5-6 instruments. It gives error for some others. For the main instruments that I am particularly interested in, it works. I was just checking the rest of them for robustness. So I conclude that I have to think more intuitively as you propose. I ran model diagnostics and there is no error so I guess timing is not the problem as you said.

Best
Stelios
Athens University of Economics and Business
St_aueb
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:07 am

Re: RANK CONDITION NOT VERIFIED

Postby St_aueb » Sun May 31, 2015 10:04 am

jpfeifer wrote:I don't think this is a timing issue. It's not the Blanchard-Kahn conditions that are violated, but the rank condition. There may be a good economic reason why for some instruments, there is no unique determinate solution. Have you tried thinking about the economic intuition behind the different results for different instruments? Is there a pattern for which instruments it works?


I noticed that when I remove debt from my model, the problem disappears. This hods for every instrument
St_aueb
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:07 am

Re: RANK CONDITION NOT VERIFIED

Postby jpfeifer » Sun May 31, 2015 11:05 am

Maybe this is a problem with Ricardian equivalence then. Debt and lump sum transfers are identical.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests