A general question: more complicated, worse?

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

A general question: more complicated, worse?

Postby superztt » Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:41 pm

When I have more variables and more conditions characterized by equations, it's harder to get steady state and satisfy the Blanchard Kahn condition. The model running in dynare becomes very delicate. For example, real price or nominal price, with adjustment cost or not.

Is my feeling right or there've got to be something wrong when I make the model more complicated and it's nothing to do with the number of variables or equations?
superztt
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:24 pm

Re: A general question: more complicated, worse?

Postby jpfeifer » Sun Jul 26, 2015 2:18 pm

Steady state finding becomes harder as you need to provide more good starting values (except for linearized models of course). Similarly for Blanchard-Kahn, the more equations you enter the more scope for mistakes and your part. Complexity is not a problem for the computer but for the human user. Thus, it is always recommended to start with a working core model and then subsequently add features.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron