Very Large t statistics in the estimated DSGE model

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Very Large t statistics in the estimated DSGE model

Postby Cem279 » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:21 pm

Dear all.

I have estimated Cho and Moreno's (2006) new IS-LM model using data for Turkey and I ended up with very large (such as >21.000) t stat values following MLE estimation. I have several questions:

1) Could this be due to the non-stationarity of one or several variables despite the fact that the ADF tests indicated otherwise?

2) Could it be possible to obtain bootstrapped standard errors using Dynare since asymptotic standard errors would be inaccurate with a sample of 66 observations?

3) In the Dynare document I could not see anything about the declaration
of nonstationary values as unit_root_vars. Supposing that this is done, then what is the use of setting lik_init=2 during the estimation (MLE) since already the variables are defined as unit root?

4) How can I plot confidence intervals around the IRF's ?

Thank you for any suggestions, merci d'avance.
Cem279
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:00 pm

Re: Very Large t statistics in the estimated DSGE model

Postby MichelJuillard » Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:46 pm

Cem279 wrote:Dear all.

I have estimated Cho and Moreno's (2006) new IS-LM model using data for Turkey and I ended up with very large (such as >21.000) t stat values following MLE estimation. I have several questions:

1) Could this be due to the non-stationarity of one or several variables despite the fact that the ADF tests indicated otherwise?

I don't see how. Remember that the t statistic corresponds to the null hypothesis that the coefficient equals zero. So, this one maybe far from zero. I don't understand what worries you. If you have very very large t statistics and zero standard error, then you shoul worry that the optimization stopped agains a boundary and you can't do the tests the usual way.

2) Could it be possible to obtain bootstrapped standard errors using Dynare since asymptotic standard errors would be inaccurate with a sample of 66 observations?

Yes, but you have to write the bootstrap code yourself. Baiscally taking the point estimates, using them to calibrate the model. Then write a loop that simulate a sample using stoch_simul(periods=66,....) then estimate the model back for this sample, saving t he results and looping again
3) In the Dynare document I could not see anything about the declaration
of nonstationary values as unit_root_vars. Supposing that this is done, then what is the use of setting lik_init=2 during the estimation (MLE) since already the variables are defined as unit root?

There is an entry for unit_root_vars in the estimation section of the manual. You shouldn't use lik_init anymore.
4) How can I plot confidence intervals around the IRF's ?

There is no provision for it, yet.

Best

Michel
MichelJuillard
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:51 am

One last question still linked to t statistics

Postby Cem279 » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:58 pm

thank you for your prompt reply.

You had said:
[quote]
If you have very very large t statistics and zero standard error, then you shoul worry that the optimization stopped agains a boundary and you can't do the tests the usual way.
[quote]
Well, I suspect this happened since in my previous post the my example looked like 21 because of a wrongly used dot, whereas it is supposed to be around 21000 and standart errors are around 0.0001 or 0.0002. Your comment seems to explain why I ended up with very different estimates over several runs of estimation. I picked up the estimation with the highest objective function among all and with no "reversing the gradient" warning message.

I suspect I keep hitting against several local maximums.

What would be the strategy to adopt in this case?

Regards.
Cem279
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:00 pm

Postby MichelJuillard » Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:27 pm

You should try to understand why you are hitting against a boundary in the parameter space. One way is to start with one observed variable, then adding the other one by one to try to understand where the difficulty pops up

Kind regards

Michel
MichelJuillard
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:51 am


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests