Imaginary eigenvalues and Blanchard-Kahn condition

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Imaginary eigenvalues and Blanchard-Kahn condition

Postby szms » Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:19 pm

Hello!

I have two questions, please answer them :)

- 1: what does it mean when the imaginary part of the eigenvalue is not equal to zero? Is that a problem?
- 2: I have for example 5 forward-looking variables and just 4 eigenvalues larger than 1, then I change the timing of an equation by decreasing it by 1, and then there are 4 forward-looking variables and 4 eigenvalues larger than 1, so the rank condition is now verified. Is that an approppriate procedure?
For example:
c0=1/(beta*(1+rk(+1)-delta)/c1(+1));
c0(-1)=1/(beta*(1+rk-delta)/c1);

Thanks for Your help!!!
szms
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 9:49 pm

Re: Imaginary eigenvalues and Blanchard-Kahn condition

Postby jpfeifer » Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:07 am

1) As we are talking about generalized eigenvalues, this is not a problem - unless you get oscillating IRFs.
2) No, this is not appropriate. There is one unique correct timing and you cannot arbitarily shift timings.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests