Continous Zero Lower Bound Implementation

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Continous Zero Lower Bound Implementation

Postby HMEvers » Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:53 pm

In order to replicate recent NK models which implement the Zero Lower Bound, so an interest rate which is subject to the constrained of being positive,
I have derived a continuous version of the Kronecker Delta function(an IF function) for the monetary policy rule, so it gives Rzlb(R)=R for R>0 and Rzlb(R)=0 for R<0.

The function I used is:
Rzlb = k*log(1-exp(-1/k)+exp(r/k));

Which perfectly approximates the "If" function for when k tends to zero.
So I have set k=1/1000 #so some very small value ( a plot can be seen here: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%281%2F1000%29*log%281-exp%28-1%2F%281%2F1000%29%29%2Bexp%28x%2F%281%2F1000%29%29%29 )

Also the taylor series approximation follows the "If" function, although it is dependant from which value the approximation is made whether it will give zero everywhere or Rzlb=R everywhere.
I figured for small deviations in R this shouldn't be a problem, only when crossing between negative and positive values.
however, after I ran some models, and saved the output using the dynasave command, I found when comparing the Rzlb output with its R input, the Rzlb function still gave negative values.

I am using the Stoch simulate command, and the function within the log shouldnt be zero.

Any ideas why it doesn't work?
Code: Select all
y = y(+1) - 1/sigmaC*(r-pi(+1)) + s_b;
   pi = beta*pi(+1) + ((1-theta)*(1-beta*theta)/theta)*(sigmaC+sigmaL)*y + s_p;
   % Monetary Policy Rule
   
   % R input where rz is the unbounded r, and r is the interest rate constrained to be positive
   rz = rho*r(-1) +  (1-rho)*( phi_pi*pi + phi_y*y ) + phi_dy*(y-y(-1)) + s_r  ;
    r = k*log(1-exp(-1/k)+exp(rz/k));
HMEvers
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:33 pm

Re: Continous Zero Lower Bound Implementation

Postby jpfeifer » Sun Jun 05, 2016 6:28 pm

If I understand you correctly, you are basically using a barrier function approach. That does not get you around the problem that a first order Taylor approximation is going to replace your nonlinear function by a linear one. An linear functions by construction are unbounded.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Continous Zero Lower Bound Implementation

Postby HMEvers » Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:01 pm

Thank you for the answer!
HMEvers
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:33 pm


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests