Deleting redundant equation changes IRFs
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:07 pmHi together,
this question is related to http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6174: It is the same model/file, I only substituted some of the specifications of the utility function into the model, i.e. instead of uc and an additional equation that states uc=1/c I directly inserted everywhere 1/c.
I have one specification left ucc, but if I delete that variable I get different results (to the power of -4). As an example, the tax rate (row 7 in oo_.endo_simul) in the second period goes from 0.240000014217568 (with ucc) to 0.239998670891546 (without ucc), i.e. it changes also qualitatively relative to its steady state 0.24. Now, is that a numerical error I have to live with or is there something wrong?
Thanks
Ps. I also checked just setting ucc=1 insteady of ucc=-1/c^2 but it is the same result - again, ucc is not in the model otherwise! When I used stoch_simul it correctly puts the coefficient 0 in front of the states.
this question is related to http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6174: It is the same model/file, I only substituted some of the specifications of the utility function into the model, i.e. instead of uc and an additional equation that states uc=1/c I directly inserted everywhere 1/c.
I have one specification left ucc, but if I delete that variable I get different results (to the power of -4). As an example, the tax rate (row 7 in oo_.endo_simul) in the second period goes from 0.240000014217568 (with ucc) to 0.239998670891546 (without ucc), i.e. it changes also qualitatively relative to its steady state 0.24. Now, is that a numerical error I have to live with or is there something wrong?
Thanks
Ps. I also checked just setting ucc=1 insteady of ucc=-1/c^2 but it is the same result - again, ucc is not in the model otherwise! When I used stoch_simul it correctly puts the coefficient 0 in front of the states.