NKM estimated values are strange

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

NKM estimated values are strange

Postby mia_lau » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:31 am

Hi,

I am running estimations on a NK model with non-zero steady state inflation, ascari-ropele (2007) typy. The model is loglinearised and I use Euro Area data for now (please see the attached files). My problem is that the estimated values are out of what I expected and also what the literature says. The parameter sigma (inverse of intertemporal elasticity) as well as the parameter for habit formation (h) are too low, eta (inverse of the elasticity of labour supply) is too high. I also have some issues with the TR parameter phi_y. Can someone help me please? (I attach the code and data files)

Or would it be preferable that instead of structural parameters, I estimate composed parameters of the phillips curve, xi_f, xi_b, kappa …?

And my last question: why is dynare running the same estimation three times? (please see the attached .log saved as text file)
Attachments
EA_str.log.txt
dynare log file
(24.17 KiB) Downloaded 157 times
EA.xls
data file
(61 KiB) Downloaded 183 times
EA_str.mod
dynare file
(3.69 KiB) Downloaded 158 times
mia_lau
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:41 pm

Re: NKM estimated values are strange

Postby jpfeifer » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:39 pm

I cannot do the debugging, but the 3 runs of estimation are explained by
Code: Select all
 nobs=[86:90]

which triggers recursive estimation for samples of 86 to 90 observations. I am also puzzled by you not using demeaned output for estimation
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: NKM estimated values are strange

Postby mia_lau » Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:15 am

the data for output are given as the output growth, a seasonally adjusted growth rate of GDP in constant prices. thats where the observation equation y_obs = y-y(-1) comes from. Is it wrong?
mia_lau
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:41 pm

Re: NKM estimated values are strange

Postby jpfeifer » Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:48 am

But you did not demean output growth in the data and do not allow for a constant in your observation equation.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: NKM estimated values are strange

Postby mia_lau » Fri Apr 08, 2016 12:02 pm

thank you for your reply. Originally I thought that the constant in observation equation cancels out if I use output growth. Now I did demean the output growth (using HP filter), however the results did not change much. The estimated values are pretty much as before. Could it be caused by something else?
Thanks a lot in advance!
mia_lau
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:41 pm


Return to Dynare contributions and examples

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests