Expectations + Second order

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Expectations + Second order

Postby maxar » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:41 am

Hi,

I am puzzled by one result in Dynare and would like your help to understand it.
I would like to plot response of the expectation of a variable, say consumption, to a one time shock (the typical impulse-response graph). I have potentially two ways of doing this. The first is to create a new variable, EC = C(+1) and plot it. The second is to plot the one-period-ahead IRF for consuption.
In a first order approximation both procedures give the same result. In a second order, they are different, but the difference is always constant (I start the IRF at the "stochastic steady state", defined as the situation where all shocks are shut-down but agents expect them to be non-zero, but this does not matter for the result).
I would like to understand why they are different.

Thank you,
Max
maxar
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:41 pm

Re: Expectations + Second order

Postby maxar » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:06 pm

I am attaching a file which reproduces the behavior I describe (the file is and example from Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde, I just tweak some values to make the behavior more salient).

I appreciate if someone can explain why the difference.
Thank you
Attachments
rbc_sv_low.mod
(3.94 KiB) Downloaded 72 times
maxar
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:41 pm

Re: Expectations + Second order

Postby MichelJuillard » Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:00 pm

According to your computations, the IRF in t+1 computes the one-period ahead forecast conditional on future shocks equal to zero. EC computes the one-period ahead conditional expectation of C(t+1). This is only identical if the forecast function is linear, not when it is quadratic in shocks.The difference comes from Jensen's inequality.

Hope it helps

Michel
MichelJuillard
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:51 am


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests