Hi all, recently I ran the codes in Practicing Dynare and got quite different results from those in the accompanying paper by Barillas et.al. (2010). Take The Neoclassical growth model (GrowthApproximate.mod) for example, the coefficients of the approximated policy functions and transition functions I got are the following, see the attachment (in jpg format). I do not understand why, since the codes are not changed at all. By the way, I use dynare 4.3.3.
Thanks for your help.
Dynare forums
Forums for asking questions, posting comments and uploading examples related to Dynare
Why I got different results from running Practicing Dynare?
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Why I got different results from running Practicing Dynare?
by dingliumath » Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:48 pm
- Attachments
-
dynare.pdf- (68.69 KiB) Downloaded 69 times
- dingliumath
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 5:08 pm
Re: Why I got different results from running Practicing Dyna
by jpfeifer » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:03 am
Because the Cooley/Prescott model in the PDF file was wrong and has never been corrected. In contrast, the mod-file has been updated to reflect the correct timing.
- jpfeifer
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests