Im working on the following simple optimal growth model:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c963b/c963b4fdb72ce3557c7f6a93d792720844a183b7" alt="Image"
with the first-order conditions:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/478cf/478cfcde7debc2bd66fba303dbb17264e0f9098e" alt="Image"
The Dynare code is:
- Code: Select all
%
%%%PREAMBLE%%%
%
var y invest k c z;
predetermined_variables k;
varexo eps;
parameters cbeta calpha crho ceta;
cbeta = .99;
calpha = .33;
crho = 0.9;
csigma = 0.035;
%
%%%MODELBLOCK%%%
%
model;
1/c = cbeta * 1/c(+1) * calpha * exp(z(+1)) * k(+1)^(calpha-1);
k(+1) = exp(z) * k^calpha - c;
z = crho*z(-1) + eps;
y = exp(z) * k^calpha;
invest = y - c;
end;
%
%%%INITIAL VALUE BLOCK%%%
%
initval;
k = 0.2;
c = 0.4;
z = 0;
end;
steady;
%
%%%SHOCKS%%%
%
shocks;
var eps = csigma^2;
end;
stoch_simul(periods = 2000,order=2, irf=40);
state_range=0:0.1:10;
state_name='k';
plot_var_name='c';
plot_policy_fun(state_name,state_range,plot_var_name);
For plotting the policy function I used the m-file by jpfeifer » Sat Mar 16, 2013 (attached)
My goal is to show the differences that occur between the policy functions using first and second order approximation due to certainty equivalence.
Yet I got really strange results. For the 2nd order approximation my policy function looks like
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c7b7/8c7b77bf1e202d66ae3c59b9f435c8786fce5bb7" alt="Image"
and for my 1st order approx the policy function looks like
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e6/686e698a26570fd8ed5b9339ea14bd53149ee947" alt="Image"
Im very thankful for any help!
Best regards,
nbt