Blanchard-Kahn condition & Non-ricardian HH

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Blanchard-Kahn condition & Non-ricardian HH

Postby miga_7 » Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:06 am

Hi,

I'm working on a simple NK code, and step by step adding features to match my own model. I'm adding non-ricardian HH to the model, a I want to look at effect of fiscal policy, and as soon as I add that the Blanchard-Kahn condition is no longer satisfied. I'm going through all the parameter values to see if I can get the e-values smaller. But does anyone have any idea why this is happening, in case that doesn't work?

Code is attached. Initial values are imported to the dynare file from a matlab steady-state file, so all the files are needed to run it.

Thank you very much in advance for your help.
Attachments
steady_stateH.m
(2.48 KiB) Downloaded 55 times
nk3H.mod
(5.78 KiB) Downloaded 71 times
mainH.m
(2.25 KiB) Downloaded 55 times
miga_7
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 6:23 pm

Re: Blanchard-Kahn condition & Non-ricardian HH

Postby jpfeifer » Thu Jun 12, 2014 6:05 pm

Check the necessary signs for debt feedback. Currently, if B_P goes up, spending increases. It could be the other way round depending on how you defined B_P.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Blanchard-Kahn condition & Non-ricardian HH

Postby miga_7 » Thu Jun 12, 2014 7:00 pm

Yes you're right. I have changed that (B>0 means government is in debt). But still gives the same error.

Sorry, just editing to say, the original is actually correct. B>0 means government is in debt, so coefficient of log(B) is the government consumption should be negative. So that can't be the problem with the Blanchard-Kahn condition. Do you know of any other reasons that might cause it?

Thanks
miga_7
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 6:23 pm

Re: Blanchard-Kahn condition & Non-ricardian HH

Postby jpfeifer » Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:36 am

Did you solve it? If it is not a matter of the parameters, it must be a timing problem. But this is hard to track without knowing the model.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests