SW 2007 model

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

SW 2007 model

Postby ekaya » Wed Mar 04, 2015 3:05 pm

In SW (2007) model, Smets and wouters didn't multiply with 100 enflation and interest rate variables and the others multiplied with 100.
Why
Thanks
Last edited by ekaya on Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ekaya
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby jpfeifer » Wed Mar 04, 2015 3:26 pm

According to their data Appendix, the inflation rate is multiplied by 100 and the interest rate is already measured in percentage points (i.e. the raw series is already multiplied by 100)
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby ekaya » Thu Mar 05, 2015 10:12 am

I will ask a question too.
Smets and Wouters (2007) didn't take first differenced interest rate variable, I wonder this why it is.
thanks again
you solved my problem every time.
ekaya
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby jpfeifer » Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:06 am

Because the interest rate is already stationary and does not need to be detrended. In contrast, output has a trend.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby ekaya » Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:36 pm

Thank you very much for helping me solve this problem.
and what about confidence interval?
How can we interpret it?Is it important?
and tha other question ı wonder, why Smets and wouters multiplied variables with 100
thanks again
ekaya
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby ekaya » Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:34 pm

Thank you very much for helping me solve this problem.
and what about confidence interval?
How can we interpret it?Is it important?
and tha other question ı wonder, why Smets and wouters multiplied variables with 100
thanks again
ekaya
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby jpfeifer » Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:54 am

See http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5697

There are no confidence intervals in SW 2007. What do you mean?
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby ekaya » Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:43 am

Mr. Johannes Pfeifer,

I am grateful to you

like this %5 %95, what does it mean?, Is it important?
How can we interpret it?

Prior distribution Posterior distribution
Distr. Mean St.Dev. Mode Mean 5% 95%
ϕ Normal 4.00 1.50 5.48 5.74 3.97 7.42
σ c Normal 1.50 0.37 1.39 1.38 1.16 1.59
h Beta 0.70 0.10 0.71 0.71 0.64 0.78
ξ w Beta 0.50 0.10 0.73 0.70 0.60 0.81
σ L
Normal 2.00 0.75 1.92 1.83 0.91 2.78
thanks again
ekaya
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby jpfeifer » Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:18 pm

Yes, it is important. It refers to the prior and posterior coming from Bayesian estimation. If you are not familiar with these concepts, you should not be estimating a model using these techniques. Before proceeding, take a look at e.g. An/Schorfheide (2007)
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: SW 2007 model

Postby ekaya » Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:12 am

thanks again
ekaya
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:39 pm


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests