Dear Johannes,
If only mode_compute=6 can be used to find mode, since 9 or 4 has ''hessian matrix at the "mode" is not positive definite'' issue. Then after I start at the mode found by 6 and run MCMC, say , 1 million draws, and finally all
estimated variables converge. Then would this result reliable? Should I do other things to enhance the probability of finding a global mode?
Many thanks,
Huan
Dynare forums
Forums for asking questions, posting comments and uploading examples related to Dynare
Is mode_compute=6 MCMC results reliable...
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Is mode_compute=6 MCMC results reliable...
by ZBCPA » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:34 am
- ZBCPA
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 4:15 am
Re: Is mode_compute=6 MCMC results reliable...
by jpfeifer » Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:00 am
Problems like the one your report often signify some deeper underlying problem. Have you compared the posterior density found by the respective mode-finders? Is the one by mode_compute=6 really the best?
In general, finding the global mode is hard and often requires a lot of trial and error. Looking at the mode_check plots after mode-finding often reveals whether something is wrong.
In general, finding the global mode is hard and often requires a lot of trial and error. Looking at the mode_check plots after mode-finding often reveals whether something is wrong.
- jpfeifer
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests