Hello,
I am trying to run jpfeifer's Garcia-Cicco et al (2010) code with different data set, but I keep on getting very narrow posteriors (especially for the measurement error se's). I assumed this was due to the wrong initial values, but if I make a slight change in the initial value, then I end up with even worse results like bimodal posteriors.
I tried putting the peak or mode of these posteriors as the initial value for each parameter, but it wouldn't get much better. I also tried different mode check options like 9, but the "error using chol" says that "the matrix must be positive definite."
What should I do to improve the posteriors to be more normal shaped? Does it really have something to do with the specification of initial values? Or are the posteriors good enough already? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
jolee