Posterior Mode v.s. Posterior Mean

This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location where you will have to reset your password.
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.

Posterior Mode v.s. Posterior Mean

Postby fuyangzhao » Sun Nov 06, 2016 12:28 pm

Hi Professor,
In dynare reference manuel, it is said that
After running estimation, the parameters M_.params and the variance matrix M_.Sigma_e of the shocks are set to the mode for maximum likelihood estimation or posterior mode computation without Metropolis iterations.
After estimation with Metropolis iterations (option mh_replic > 0 or option load_mh_file set) the parameters M_.params and the variance matrix M_.Sigma_e of the shocks are set to the posterior mean.


However, I want to get the estimation output
Code: Select all
 oo_.PosteriorIRF.dsge.HPDinf/sup
where M_.params and M_.Sigma_e are set to the posterior mode ...Is that possible?

Or, is the estimation output
Code: Select all
 oo_.PosteriorIRF.dsge.HPDinf/sup
the same no matter M_.params and M_.Sigma_e are set to the posterior mode or to the posterior mean?
fuyangzhao
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:20 pm

Re: Posterior Mode v.s. Posterior Mean

Postby jpfeifer » Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:13 pm

The question is not well-defined.
Code: Select all
HPDinf/sup

is a "confidence band" across parameters. You cannot compute the variability of IRFS across parameters if you fix the parameters.
------------
Johannes Pfeifer
University of Cologne
https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/
jpfeifer
 
Posts: 6940
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany


Return to Dynare help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests