Hello,
I post this message on the off-chance that someone has an immediate answer without needing to go through the files:
Would there be any obvious reason why a mod file which ran perfectly through complete Bayesian estimation under 4.1.1 would fail under 4.3.0 (in this case with the message that "The steady state contains NaN or Inf")?
Many thanks
Donihue
Dynare forums
Forums for asking questions, posting comments and uploading examples related to Dynare
Dynare 4.3.0 vs 4.1.1
Forum rules
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
This forum is closed. You can read the posts but cannot write. We have migrated the forum to a new location (https://forum.dynare.org) where you will have to reset your password.
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dynare 4.3.0 vs 4.1.1
by donihue » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:44 am
- donihue
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:12 pm
Re: Dynare 4.3.0 vs 4.1.1
by jpfeifer » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:08 am
If you post the mod, the steadystate and the datafile (or send them) we might be able to find out.
- jpfeifer
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:02 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Re: Dynare 4.3.0 vs 4.1.1
by donihue » Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:45 pm
Thanks for the offer Johannes, but I don't think it's worth your effort - I have the earlier results which are perfectly useable; it was just a question of curiosity.
Regards
Donihue
Regards
Donihue
- donihue
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:12 pm
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests